Created a new section entitled "Interface" so that readers have an idea of what the average computer-based DAW looks like (and how it works). radio industry seems to be moving towards computer-based DAWs. Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.57.103.19 ( talk) 11:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC) New sections Īdded a few sentences on how U.S. I sorted it once, but don't know why it was reverted to this incoherent listing. This ection being as is, it should at least be properly srted either by DAW name or by company / daw, mixing "Ableton Live" and "Steinberg Cubase" with "Nuendo" and "REAPER" is ridiculous.
#IZOTOPE TRASH 2 GEARSLUTZ HOW TO#
It would be nice but I don't know how to code it.- Joenovice ( talk) 13:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Cheers, AtaruMoroboshi ( talk) 13:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Category:Audio_editors doesn't include many of the listed DAW platforms (likely because Audio Editors and these commercial packages are not the same). It's an encyclopedia article so no "Please click on the below link to see the individual article" stuff. The conversational tone of your edits should be removed too. If you do list them, (which I'm not entirely sure we should) the list should be but in a table. This edit is available to preview within the edit history section of the article.- Joenovice ( talk) 04:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC) I think a commerical section similar to the following "Open Source" section could also resolve this misdirection.- Joenovice ( talk) 17:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC) A note: the category Category:Audio_editors greatly captures this information already. This could be cleaned up by simply listing and linking to articles or stubs. As it currently stand the "Comerical" section is a mess with incomplete information and a noticable bias regarding software/companies. It would be more effective to list EVERY platform and link these names to other Wikipedia articles.
#IZOTOPE TRASH 2 GEARSLUTZ SOFTWARE#
Section removed and replaced with links to better written articles of each commercial platform.- Joenovice ( talk) 12:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC) I don't feel it's necessary to detail individual software programs.
1 Commerical System Section dispute review.
0 kommentar(er)
